[ English | Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano ]

The conclusive number of Kyrgyzstan gambling dens is something in a little doubt. As details from this country, out in the very remote interior area of Central Asia, often is difficult to receive, this may not be too difficult to believe. Regardless if there are two or 3 authorized gambling halls is the thing at issue, maybe not in fact the most earth-shattering bit of information that we don’t have.

What will be accurate, as it is of most of the ex-Soviet nations, and certainly truthful of those in Asia, is that there no doubt will be a good many more not legal and backdoor gambling halls. The change to legalized wagering didn’t encourage all the illegal places to come out of the dark and become legitimate. So, the debate regarding the number of Kyrgyzstan’s gambling halls is a minor one at best: how many legal ones is the element we’re attempting to answer here.

We know that located in Bishkek, the capital municipality, there is the Casino Las Vegas (a spectacularly original name, don’t you think?), which has both table games and one armed bandits. We will also see both the Casino Bishkek and the Xanadu Casino. Both of these contain 26 one armed bandits and 11 gaming tables, divided between roulette, blackjack, and poker. Given the amazing similarity in the sq.ft. and layout of these two Kyrgyzstan casinos, it may be even more astonishing to determine that they share an location. This appears most confounding, so we can clearly state that the list of Kyrgyzstan’s gambling dens, at least the legal ones, ends at two members, 1 of them having changed their title just a while ago.

The nation, in common with nearly all of the ex-Soviet Union, has experienced something of a fast change to free-enterprise economy. The Wild East, you could say, to allude to the anarchical conditions of the Wild West a century and a half back.

Kyrgyzstan’s gambling halls are almost certainly worth checking out, therefore, as a bit of social analysis, to see dollars being gambled as a form of social one-upmanship, the apparent consumption that Thorstein Veblen spoke about in nineteeth century usa.